psychosis

 

                                                                INCOMPLETE MORAL DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ILL HEALTH:

                                                                                                    PSYCHOPATHY  OR 'PSYCHOSIS'  

    

theme: Psychological health is measured by the degree to which people relate to others; the inability to relate to others is a symptom of psychological ill health i.e. psychopathy or'psychosis’. Psychosis is the result of thwarted growth i.e. neurotic development or 'neurosis'.  Neurosis is a function of obstruction of normal growth and development. If children's instinctive strivings for growth are thwarted, this creates a basic anxiety which can be damaging because it inhibits normal growth and development of moral consciousness or 'conscience'. Development of conscience depends on education which allows for mature growth or 'self-actualisation'. Self-actualisation engages the spiritual dimension of the human personality or 'human nature'. Human nature is a function of development of human potential... the product of education for the prson as a whole or 'holistic education'. 

psychosis as egocentric dialogue of narcissism... not to be confused with spiritual crisis...

development of human conscience.. 

failure of development of conscience... immature conscience or 'immaturity' 

psychopathy...   or 'malignant egophrenia'...   projecting the shadow...

implications for education...

Psychosis is a suboptimal state of consciousness that views 'reality' in a distorted way and does not recognize the distortion... involves egocentric dialogue of 'immaturity'. From this perspective, the individual in western cultures who is attached to the waking state of consciousness fits the criteria of psychosis. Such an individual's perception of reality is suboptimal and therefore distorted. Such an individual is psychotic if he does not recognize the distortion. ...

"Within the Western model, we recognize and define 'psychosis' as a suboptimal state of consciousness that views 'reality' in a distorted way and does not recognize that distortion. It is therefore significant to note that from the mystical perspective, our usual state fits all the criteria of psychosis in that it is suboptimal, has a distorted view of reality, and does not recognize that distortion. Indeed, from the ultimate mystical perspective, psychosis can be defined as being trapped or attached to, any one state of consciousness, which by itself  is necessarily limited and only relatively 'real'.  Fully developed mystics state unequivocally that our usual state of consciousness is not only suboptimal, it is dreamlike and illusory. They assert that whether we know it or not, we, as untrained individuals, are prisoners of our own minds, totally and unwittingly trapped by a continuous fantasy-dialogue that creates an all-consuming illusory distortion of perception or 'reality'. However, this condition goes unrecognized until we begin to subject our perceptual-cognitive processes to rigorous scrutiny such as meditation..." (Roger Walsh and Frances Vaughan editors. Beyond Ego: Transpersonal Dimensions in Psychology Tarcher, Inc. Los Angeles l980 p.38)

Psychosis is a mental condition in which the individual is attached to one state of consciousness which by itself is necessarily limited and only partially represents the reality of their world or 'map'... the map is not the territory (Korzybski)...  ‘truth’... The psychotic individual is ‘prisoner of their own mind’ - they are unwittingly but totally trapped by a continuous fantasy dialogue with themselves. This egocentric dialogue produces a perceptual-cognitive mental process which dichotomizes and distorts reality and creates the all-consuming illusion of that distorted reality. The distorted reality is a function of the distortion in perception. their perception of reality is 'suboptimall'. The individual's 'reality' is their perception of reality i.e. their worldview or ‘paradigm’. Different paradigms represent different perceptions of reality.

 Different psychoses represent different forms of egocentric dialogue. For the individual with irrational fears of immaturity, reality is perceived and understood in terms of a cognitive process which is trapped in those fears. This might be expressed as the active clinging to an outmoded view of reality developed in childhood and inappropriately transferred to the adult environment i.e. 'transference'. The psychosis often goes unrecognized until the individual accepts the personal challenge for self-examination in the form of observation and reflection i.e. contemplation or ‘meditation’. (Ram Dass Journey of Awakening: a Meditator's Guidebook. New York: Doubleday, l978)

Immature conscience is source of human wickedness or 'evil'. The mature conscience is the biological mechanism for preservation of personality integrity required for adaptation to changing social conditions i.e.'adaptability'. Human adaptabilty depends on the guiding values of rational conscience which enas the organism to solve the problems of human existence. One of the most difficult problems is deciding  the extent of one’s responsibilities. Immaturity of conscience can result in behaviour for which the individual finds it too painful to decide on the extent of their responsibility and so will avoid it altogether. And they will perceive freedom  as painful since that implies responsibility as well.The inability to accept the responsibility of freedom leads to the incapacity for creative and adaptive decision-making... to the decline in self-reliance... to the predominance of negative  emotions such as fear and hatred. As a result the individual resorts to methods of power politics and control – methods which violate the rights of others. The controlling behaviour of the immature conscience results in the destructiveness of human wickedness or ‘evil’. Evil is a product of education which inhibits spiritual growth of ego transcendance or 'self-transcendance'.  

‘psychopathy'...derived from the Greek ‘psych’ for ‘soul’ and ‘pathos’ for ‘suffering’. Psychopathy is psychological ill health also known as ‘antisocial personality disorder’... dissocial personality disorder, narcissistic personality disorder, histrionic personality disorder.. a mental condition which is characterised by undeveloped ‘immature’ conscience or ‘lack of conscience’ and so the inability to relate to the humanity of others i.e. ‘empathy’. The psychopath is a pathologically egocentric prisoner of their own mind… totally trapped by a continuous ‘fantasy’ dialogue with themselves… distorting reality and creating an all-consuming illusion of that distorted reality. They have high verbal intelligence but no ‘emotional intelligence’ and consequently no insight which explains their callousness and poor judgement. Their emotions are superficial and shallow, they are unable to love and they do not experience remorse or shame because they do not feel responsible for their actions. They have no concern for the feelings of other people or even of their own. They don't understand the impact of their antisocial behaviour on other people and this has to be explained to them.. They have a distorted sense of the potential consequences of their actions, not only for others, but also for themselves. Their ‘friends’ are people who protect them from the consequences of their own antisocial attitudes. They are pathological liars and will blame others for their own failings. They are insincere but with superficial charm they watch and mimic other people and manipulate their emotions in order to control them and use them for their own selfish needs. They show poor impulse control and a low tolerance for frustration and aggression   generally unresponsive  no life plan. incurable also untreatable. impulsively violent  ... shallow friendships Their stories are characteristically shallow with respect to their emotional aspect… they have difficulty describing or explaining their own feelings.

 

  The mental condition of psychopathy originates in the inhibition of development of moral consciousness or ‘conscience' as a result of a childhood characterised by emotional impoverishment caused by parental indifference. In the absence of unconditional love, when a child’s normal feelings are not acknowledged... if they are intimidated by brutality and isolated by overprotection and possessiveness, their self-esteem is undermined and they perceive their environment as a threat to their growth and happiness. Basic fear and anxiety is instilled and this inhibits the normal progression of instinctive strivings for growth i.e. ‘moral development’ as the development of rational conscience. Rational or ‘mature’ conscience is required for preservation of personality integration during the process of adaptation to changing social conditions.

  In dealing effectively with the psychopathic personality one must understand that they still suffer from the pain which they endured as children when they were treated as objects to be owned rather than persons to be set free for growth. They continue to feel the need to have their feelings acknowledged while at the same time repressing those same feelings. They experience inner conflict and as a result they don’t recognise the feelings of others. They don’t understand why their lack of feeling has the detrimental effect which it does. This personality type has a problem which they can’t and won’t deal with so they project it onto others. People who comply unwittingly with their demands follow a dangerous course. By internalising other people’s projections, one creates real problems for oneself. Projection is a protective mechanism which the disordered personality uses in order to protect their integrity which is damaged as a result of failure to develop moral consciousness or ‘conscience’… so  ‘without conscience’. . 

 

   misperceptions result from the so-called ‘perception problem’ of the psychopathic personality. ..  The antisocial personality type goes through life trapped in the same irrational fears which they experienced in their childhood growing up of spiritually as well as materially  poor  dysfunctional family in which the father as the authority figure denies the mother’s  individuality. Unconditional love… mature responsibility… universal love for people as fellow human beings… all these things are not understood because they are not experienced. Parents’ possessive ‘love’ replaces the unconditional love required for security and proper growth. The children who grow up in this spiritually impoverished environment in which they are  treated as property and obliged to meet parental demands for compensation for their own childhood deprivations… they suppress their feelings to dull the pain of indifferent parenting… they are inclined to arrest their own development in favor of holding onto the security which they desperately need. Proper growth and development of conscience is almost impossible. If material poverty is perceived as contributing to their own spiritual impoverishment then they disguise their own personal suffering in the form of negative disdainful attitudes which they subconsciously project onto others. They learn to hide behind a ‘persona’ which they create for themselves. They actively cling to a view of reality or ‘fantasy’ which they inappropriately transfer to their adult environment even though it becomes outmoded.  If their adult environment includes family with children they continue to live in their illusory world of  fantasy and will attempt to mold the new family according to the ‘fantasy’ family which they imagined in their own childhood. The mother of the family becomes the mother of the childhood fantasy family but at the same time is perceived as the disappointing mother experienced in the childhood of reality. The person compensates for the absence of validation during their own impoverished childhood by validating themselves and continually strive for validation in the form of material success and monetary gain. Attitudes towards money and material status override validation of human sensitivities and human values which become degraded. Such attitudes can be overwhelming if they coincide with similar attitudes in the society in which one lives. Growing up in this kind of family situation is fraught with obstacles and requires constant vigilance. For these reasons it is essential to have an understanding of one’s family background in order to understand the emotional forces which impact one’s own life and then put those forces into the right perspective. These should be properly identified and analysed in order to protect oneself from the detrimental effects to one’s life, liberty and happiness. 

  

 

  ...in the early part of the 20th century the term for psycopathy was ‘moral insanity’

Hervey Cleckley (1903-1984) wrote one of the first definitive studies of psychopathy, the classic entitled Mask of Sanity first published in 1941. The 5th edition was published in1988. The book is out of print but can be accessed on the internet. It is still the most useful source of knowledge of the subject. It is easy to read and very interesting. More recent studies have been done by Dr. Robert Hare of the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. He wroteWithout Conscience which was published in1997.

 

Psychopaths are "intraspecies predators who use charm, manipulation, intimidation, and violence to control others and to satisfy their own selfish needs. Lacking in conscience and in feelings for others, they cold-bloodedly take what they want and do as they please, violating social norms and expectations without the slightest sense of guilt or regret."(Hare, R. D. Without Conscience 1997).

 Malignant egophrenia or 'narcissism' ...traumatized soul ...   the person reacts sadistically to others who mirror back his guilt and don’t support and enable his narcissism.

collapses the boundary between inner and outer.. healthy parts of personality are co-opted by the pathology, which drafts them into its service.  personality organizes an outer display of coherence around a pathogenic core malignant egophrenia can be very destructive, particularly if the person is in a position of power.  resist self-reflection in denial of reality...  interpret any feedback from the real world which reflects back their unconsciousness as itself evidence that proves the correctness of their view gigantic catastrophes of wars and revolutions  as psychic events or  epidemic   when an inner situation is not made conscious, it manifests itself in the exterior world. The person's inner process gets dreamed up and played out on the world stage.

The daemonic aspect of malignant egophrenia develops a certain autonomy and literally possesses the person or group, as it is self-generating, self-perpetuating and self-organizing in nature, like a closed and negative feedback loop. The person who is taken over doesn't suspect a thing, as the field secretly conspires and colludes with and enables their psychosis.  delusion, imagines he is divinely guided. His supporters want to believe this to feed their own adolescent fantasies of wanting to have a divinely inspired leader to take care of and protect them. unconscious narcissistic needs in a truly pathological, and ultimately self-destructive co-dependent relationship. believies he has a Messianic mission forces tyrannous doctrines upon his fellow-beings become inflated.by the  unconscious identification with ...possessed... by the saviour archetype... forfeited one's humanity... humility becomes impossible.... embodiment of arrogant... corrupt... prefers power over truth. addicted to power

projecting the darker intentions or 'shadow'... 'the lie' ('devil' means ‘liar'). The person is unwilling and afraid to consciously feel and experience their own guilt and shame. In order to hide from their shadow they split it off and project it onto the outside world. Projecting the shadow is lying to others as well as lying to themselves . disassociation from oneself is self-deception....  self delusion... the person deludes themselves into believing their own lies They hide their own lie from themselves thus further feeding the sense of guilt and creating the process which  they are hiding from.. This process of splitting-off from  guilt develops a momentum and a sovereignty of its own and the person is taken over in the process... they are manipulated, victimized and possessed by the darker forces which they themselves set in motion through their refusal to reflect on their feelings of guilt and then experience them consciously. Fighting against their own shadow is a losing battle. The person gets caught up in a self-created and self-creating self-reinforcing feedback loop that is ‘closed’...  it is insular and not open to any feedback from the ‘real’ world an infinite regression  as the endless wheel of cyclic, problematic, involuted spiral of ever increasing madness... a crazy-making double-bind with no 'exit strategy'... this is acted out in the outside world.  The person is so dissociated from their shadow that they split off from it and  project it onto others and then try to destroy the dis-owned shadow. the person becomes possessed by the very thing they are trying to destroy, thereby perpetuating a never-ending cycle of violence.   This inability to experience their guilt sets in motion a self-perpetuating cycle of denial, cover-up and projecting the shadow, all of which are based on a lie. suffering-filled existence known in Buddhism as 'samsara'. Their unconscious, fear-based re-actions have dangerous implications. 

characteristics of malignant egophrenia...  resistance to self-reflection and endless cycle of self- deception Self-deceiving people misuse everything so as to avoid having to confront themselves. They seem convinced of what they say and project this conviction so well that they can have a  mesmerizing and gripping effect on others. Nothing has such a convincing effect as a lie one invents and believes oneself….. the pathological liar is dangerous.

  malignant egophrenia is very hard  to deal with because the person seems so normal. and even . They can be very endearing and ‘charming’ and charismatic... in this way they entrance those who don't see through their subterfuge. They are concerned about nothing other than themselves, they are indifferent to other people’s suffering, while professing compassion, like a wolf in sheep’s clothing

under-developed psychological process that deals simplistically with issues as if they  haven't grown out of the realm of mythic, archetypal fantasy that is typical of early adolescence. The immature aspect of their inner  process resonates with people for whom it is a reflection  of their own under-developed inner process.. they are blind to what is obvious to others... as if they’ve become hypnotized and fallen under his spell   People who support their narcissism also have a predisposition for it based on their own trauma, dissociated psyche and tendency to project the shadow... they are suggestible and susceptible.

Malignant egophrenia is crazy-making... the person becomes bewitched by their own projections, accusing other people of doing what they themselves are doing.   

the individual embedded in the greater field (family system, society, and planetary culture)  is an expression of this field. The individual and the field around them interpenetrate and condition each other so fully that they must be seen as inseparable parts of a greater whole. 

 archetypal in nature...   diabolical in nature.  demons Jung calls autonomous complex. split-off parts of the psyche that can possess a person and seemingly develop an independent life of their own.  The person will shape-shift and do everything in its power to resist being exposed.

 To name something is to symbolize it. The word ‘symbolic,’ which means that which unites antonym to the word ‘diabolic’ that which divides and separates

  protection is cooperation of people in lucid awareness so that it can be contained

 

Humiliating effects of psychopathic attitudes... Humiliation is a natural consequence of violation of one’s human rights.  If it is understood and dealt with intelligently, then one appreciates not only one’s own rights but also the rights of others and human rights in general. One generally associates discussion of human rights in terms of the larger social context of human societies. But it is also important to understand one’s rights in the limited social context of the ‘family’ (in the legal sense). This is particularly important if that family involves parental power of a psycopathic personality who doesn’t feel responsible for their attitudes but accepts them as natural and normal even if they are hurtful. The psychopathic parent often projects their problems onto their children who then must deal with their attitudes of moral irresponsibility towards them. In addition their failure to understand their own children’s intelligence and integrity can develop into mental abuse with its subsequent humiliating effects. Humiliation originating from internalisation of projected problems is based on the lack of understanding of what is really happening. Protection of the ego consciousness from harmful effects of irresponsible parenting depends on critical consciousness involving careful observation and comprehensive understanding of the situaton as it unfolds. It is always easier to understand with hindsight. With inner resources for increasing one’s knowledge and understanding, things turn out for the better. It’s a long process which takes work and patience but in the end all the effort is well worthwhile… whatever form it takes. With positive attitudes to the challenges of life’s problems, one gets over it each time and ends up much the wiser. Furthermore one realises that one has many advantages over the person or persons whose behaviour was responsible for the humiliation. What’s more that same humiliation can even become an important motivating force.    

 Psychosis of psychopathy is not to be confused with 'spiritual crisis' or 'spiritual emergency' which is  a warning to the person that their spiritual growth is in grave danger... they need to make adjustments which are essential for their self-preservation and adaptation i.e. 'self-sustainability' or 'adaptability'... 'spiritual emergence' (Christina and Stanislaus Grof coined the term 'spiritual emergency' and founded the Spiritual Emergency Network (SEN) at the Esalen Institute in 1980.In 1998 the SEN moved to the California Institute of Integral Studies (CIIS) in San Francisco. (website SEN@CIIS... www.senatciis.org)  also in Europe: SENGermany 

 

 "Once a person has awakened to the transpersonal dimensions of existence, life itself is held in a different perspective." This is an aspect of healthy psychological and intellectual growth... Dichotomies disappear with increased mental health... If the individuals in a society remain attached to that level of consciousness dealing with gratification of physical and emotional needs, then they would perceive a dichotomy between personal freedom 'to pursue happiness' and their responsibility to the society. If the level of consciousness of those same individuals is raised to a healthier state then they are motivated by so-called 'higher needs' or 'metaneeds'.

 

"our normative cultural reality is state-specific. Insofar as 'reality' is a consensually validated, but arbitrary, convention, an altered state of consciousness can represent an anti-social, unruly mode of being... This fear of the unpredicatable may have been a major motivating force behind the repression in our own culture of means for inducing altered states- e.g. psychedelics- or for a more general suspicion of techniques such as meditation".

 The need to coerce and dominate others is an external displacement of the need to overcome the fear of being overwhelmed by one’s own unconscious.

 The change of personality leading to mystic experience and self-transcendance is one of increasing integration as opposed to psychotic change of increasing disintegration. Spiritual crisis is intense spiritual experience ... pursuance of 'self-knowledge'... So-called ‘pursuance of self-knowledge’(knowledge of the self beyond the ego sense of self… i.e. ‘transpersonal self’) is spiritual growth or 'transpersonal experience' or 'spiritual emergence'. Spiritual emergence is a positive growth process in which the unconscious overwhelms the ego consciousness.

Spiritual work is not appreciated in a materialistic society and on the whole people don’t understand. The human values make for truly meaningful life... Important to keep an open and discerning mind. If the experience is too distressing the emergence can become an emergency... 'spiritual emergency'... Information and understanding are essential to keeping the condition under control.The psyche instinctively tries to bring about a re-equilibrium and this takes awhile... depends on self-respect, strong character and good disposition.

   “It is a grave error to accuse a man who pursues self-knowledge of 'turning his back on society’. The opposite would be more nearly true: that a man who fails to pursue self-knowldege is and remains a danger to society, for he will tend to misunderstand everything that other people say or do, and remain blissfully unaware of the significance of many of the things he does himself". (Schumacher,E A Guide for the Perplexed. New York, Harper and Row, l977)

Development of human conscience depends on unconditional love.   Normal human growth involves psychological, emotional, intellectual, spiritual and moral development  and depends on warmth and affection which communicates the security of knowledge, understanding, responsibility and care i.e. ‘unconditional love’. Unconditional love is the communication of security and stimulates interest in the environment i.e. ‘intrinsic motivation’. Intrinsic motivation engages the spiritual needs or ‘metaneeds. Engagement of metaneeds stimulates spiritual growth which is a precondition for adaptability to changing social conditions i.e. social adaptation or ‘social intelligence’. Social intelligence depends on achievement of the human potential for emotional and psychological development to spiritual maturity of moral consciousness or ‘conscience’. Mature conscience is the source of guiding values foritualr human behaviour i.e. spiritual values or 'human values'. Development of the conscience depends on a growth environment in which there is communication of security through unconditional love. 

     In the absence of security, intimidation by brutality and isolation by overprotection can undermine the individual’s self-esteem and instil in them a fear which prevents cooperation required for social adaptation. The fear is real and results in the perception of the environment as threatening to the free use of energies for growth i.e. ‘freedom’. Interest in the environment becomes warped diminishing self-reliance and creating the basic anxiety which damages the instinctive strivings for growth and development. If normal development is thwarted in this way it can lead to emotional immaturity and  immature conscience i.e. irrational behaviour of  neurotic growth or ‘neurosis’. Neurosis which results in the loss of contact with reality… the inability to relate to others develops as 'psychosis' or 'psychopathy' 

    "Unconditional love is an essential for the child's normal development, and when this is refused, the environment comes to be dreaded... the environment is perceived as a menace to his individuality, his development, his instinctive strivings to grow, his freedom and his happiness. Anxiety feelings arise in children whose parents fail to give them genuine warmth and affection - usually because of their own neuroses. These children do not experience the 'blissful certainty of being wanted'. In an environment in which the basic anxiety develops, the child's free use of energies is thwarted, his self-esteem and self-reliance are undermined, fear is instilled by intimidation and isolation, his expansiveness is warped through brutality or overprotective 'love'. The fear is grounded in reality." (Karen Horney  M.D. Neurosis and Human Growth: The Struggle Toward Self-Realization, New York: W.W. Norton & Co. Inc.1956 )            

 Implications for education: The tragedy of psychosis as thwarted growth is that it is ultimately determined by conflicts in the values and assumptions of the cultural environment - the social environment of family or school. For this reason, psychological health is a social affair and a concern of education. It is the responsibility of education to encourage the development of  highly awakened intelligence or ‘intuition’. Intuition is required for responsible decision making  in solving human problems… and depends on the individual’s capacity for personal challenge and  self-examination to see the truth. Truth is reality which combines objective reality with the subjective perception of critical consciousess. Dedication to truth is dedication to reality implying critical consciousness and a willingness to accept personal challenge for inquiry. The more clearly  one can see the reality of one’s  world the better equipped one is to deal with it, the less clearly one sees the reality of one’s world, the more one’s mind is befuddled by falsehood, misperceptions, and illusions and the less able one is to determine correct courses of action and make wise decisions. The aim of education is the development of critical consciousness and intuitive powers of discrimination i.e. wisdom or ‘intelligence’. Development of intelligence depends on development of human potential and the intrinsic power of self-reliance  which is a function of spiritual growth for the development of intrinsic human spiritual values. Education for spiritual development as embedded in psychological, emotional, intellectual development is education for the whole person i.e. ‘holistic education’.      

         Top of page  / Introduction  /  Homepage                         

   

   “It is easy in the world to live after the world's opinions; it is easy in solitude to live after our own; but the Great Man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude.”  Ralph Waldo Emerson

 

  “When we are no longer able to change a situation, we are challenged to change ourselves”. Victor Frankl

 

 individual in cultural context: distorting influences of language and culture...' neuro linguistic programing'

.From Paul Levy (www.wakeninthedream.com) malignant egophrenia is an active dynamic exists "inside" and reveals itself as it gets "dreamed up" in the "outside" world. The inner psychological process of turning away from the problem within gives shape to the person's view of the outside world... like a dream. As in a dream, the perception of the outer world is an unmediated expression or reflection of what is going on inside the dreamer...  Just like a dream, the 'inner" process of the psyche reveals itself literally and symbolically through events in the 'outside' world. This synchronistic correspondence between the inner and the outer world is not recognized because it is so obvious. This correlation between what is happening inside of ourselves and what is happening in the outside world It is fully apparent or 'transparent' while at the same time being invisible like a see-through medium. One is asked to recognize what is being revealed. Any person who integrates their own problem into their image of themselves has a non-local effect on the entire field. The only way to "fight" evil is by coming to terms with it within oneself. 

Being so taken over by his unconscious as a result of his unwillingness to feel his guilt, the inner process is incarnated into outer forms which become the embodied "revelation" of the inner process.

 like a figure in a dream - reflecting back to us the part of ourselves that is feeding and thereby supporting our own darkness. Seen as a dreaming process, in which George Bush is a figure that we’ve all dreamed up into materialization, we have dreamed him up to mirror back to us our own ignorance, madness, and darkness, so as to help us recognize and integrate these pathological parts within ourselves of which he is merely a reflection.

Being an embodied reflection of this part of ourselves is to say that Bush is not separate from us, as we are all interconnected parts and expressions of the underlying unified field. We don’t exist in isolation from Bush, nor him from us, but rather, in co-relation to each other.

Avoiding relationship with one's shadow results in a chronic 'guilty conscience'... an expression of "unconsciousness". turning away from consciously experiencing one's  own guilt and shame literally feeds the shadow, both on the personal level, and on the collective, archetypal level.  To the extent that each person is not dealing with their own guilt they  contribute to the collective shadow that plays out in the outside world.

  When one is unwilling to consciously experience their shadow they necessarily project it outside of themselves. The shadow is split off and gets "dreamed up" into materialization in the outside world. Once we meet our projected shadow in the outside world, we immediately contract against it...

the way to work on our inner process is by actively participating in the outside world, while concurrently, the very way to change the outer world is by looking within and working on our inner process.  

Once we project our shadow, we fall into a vicious cycle in which we are endlessly hiding from and lying to ourselves. In order to justify our shadow projections, we continually have to entrance ourselves into believing the lie that is inherent in our shadow projection. Jung refers to "shadow projection" as "the lie." Etymologically, lying is related to the word "Devil" who is the "liar." Shadow projection is intimately related to the evil that plays out in the world.

We secretly feel a sense of guilt when we project our shadow, because inwardly we know we are not in harmony with our integrity. This sense of guilt itself is the very feeling from which we split-off. Our guilt does not allow us to feel our guilt, which is what we secretly feel guilty over. To the extent that we don’t consciously experience our guilt, we become caught in an infinitely-perpetuating double-bind in which we project out our darkness, which just perpetuates the very thing we feel guilty about... insidious futility of shadow projection... one cannot project one’s shadow on to others, and there is no advantage in insisting on their guilt, as it is much more important to know and possess one’s own guilt, because it is part of one’s own self and a necessary factor... it is of primary importance to get in touchwith one's  own guilt.... be conscious of it... Once we consciously access our own guilt, we withdraw our projection of the shadow onto others... the evil we’re seeing in the other is our own evil… we realize that we can no longer keep evil at bay by projecting it outside of ourselves.

Once we withdraw our shadow projections from external reality, we dis-spell and dis-engage from the diabolical feedback loop which we were unknowingly feeding and in which we were imprisoned. Once we withdraw our shadow projection from the outside world and recognize it within ourselves, we are able to snap out of our self-created double-bind and consciously feel our guilt and shame and sin. Once we become fluent and engaged with the darkness within ourselves, we no longer have to hide from it, which is to say from ourselves, by projecting our shadow outside of ourselves. We can thereby take responsibility for our role in perpetuating this cycle of self-deceit and denial, and with our increased consciousness, bring our complicity in this dynamic to an end. We are then able to deal with the "sublunary world" of the dark unconscious, both within ourselves and as it appears in the outside world. Once we are acquainted with the archetypal darkness which expresses itself non-locally throughout the field, this darkness reveals itself to be an expression of the light, as it is the darkness itself that has illumined us.

Becoming "intimately related" to our own darkness empowers us to effectively deal with the darkness in the world in a way that was unavailable to us as long as we were avoiding a confrontation with our own inner darkness. When we were hiding from our own darkness, we were trying to destroy it as it appeared in the outside world (which is merely an "externalized" reflection of our "inner" act of contracting against our own darkness). In other words, the darkness (inside of us) is trying to get rid of the darkness (in the outside world), as if the darkness is trying to get rid of itself, which is the very act that generates and is generated by the darkness in the first plac

Once we consciously take the shadow back into ourselves, we become an instrument, a flash of light that illumines the darkness in the outside world. Instead of reacting to the darkness in the outside world through the lens of our own unembraced darkness, which simply creates, through projection, more darkness, we are able to see the darkness through the part of ourselves that is separate from it. Paradoxically, seeing our own evil is the very thing which activates the part of us which is "other" than and free of evil. This part of us that is "other" than evil is the only part of us that can clearly see evil (as it plays itself out both within ourselves and in the outside world) because it is not "mixed up" with it, and thus, is not blinded or deceived by it.

At the same time we see the evil part of ourselves, the part of us that is seeing evil is free of it, for we couldn’t objectify it otherwise. For example, if we have jaundice, we couldn’t pick out what objects are truly yellow, for everything looks yellow. The part of us that is seeing the color yellow is the part of us that is "yellow-free." Paradoxically, it is only in recognizing and owning the evil within ourselves that allows us, by virtue of being the witness of it, to relate to it as "other" than ourselves, which is to be free of it ("evil-free").

This is a very subtle, but immensely profound point. When we see the evil within us, by owning it we simultaneously witness it as other than and separate from ourselves, which is to get in relationship with it as an "other." Simply aware of what it is witnessing, the part of us that is the witness of "evil" is free of the attribute that is being witnessed; it is not the "guilty party." The evil I am witnessing within myself is an aspect of me and I own it but it is not mine. This is the personal/impersonal paradox of the soul: what is most me is not mine.

We are only able to bear the experience of the evil within us and not fall into overwhelming despair if we recognize the "transpersonal" origin of evil Instead of identifying with the evil we have found within, thinking it "belongs" to us individually, we recognize that evil is 'archetypal' in nature...

intrinsic wholeness enables us to not split-off from nor identify with, but rather contain, transmute and liberate deleterious effects of evil. Becoming engaged with and intimately related to the transpersonal evil within us simultaneously acquaints us with the part of ourselves that is beyond the personal ego...  

 the part that experiences the guilt that is bound up in the evil within is the guilt-free innocent) part of us. When we consciously experience our "feelings" of guilt  the underlying guilt begins to melt and transform. The "innocent" part temporarily hidden by our unwillingness to experience our guilt. Paradoxically, by consciously experiencing one's guilt and shame one experiences remorse and then becomes acquainted with one's innocence. This "innocent" part has never been tainted by darkness... unstained This innocent part can be identified as human divinity... or 'God'.

Consciousness of guilt acts as a powerful moral stimulus… without consciousness of guilt there can be no psychic ... spiritual maturation... widening of the spiritual horizon.  genuine regret... remorse brings a renewal of the spirit. This is the 'remorse of conscience' source of  humility.

"In making the shadow conscious we must be very careful that the unconscious prevent a real confrontation with the shadow which increases consciousness of the good and the positive aspects of one's nature. The shadow itself is not "bad" it is a mere "shadow" with no substance. It is our turning away from and avoiding our shadow creates the darkness from which we are turning away.

 danger of identifying withthe shadow feeling  possessed by it and acting it out unconsciously. Once we develop a strong enough sense of self, however, we relate to it as an "object" other than ourselves, but we then experience the darkness "subjectively," as we experience ourselves as the source of the darkness...  a form of clinging and grasping, which is the very act that generates the darkness against which we are resisting.

Christ said "resist not evil." embrace unconditionally both the light and dark sides of ourselves. Snapping out of the self-created and infinitely-regressing feedback loop of fighting against our own darkness is to realize that our very grasping itself is the origin of the problem of evil... we are then able to transmute the darkness into light. Christ said, "My burden IS light."

 spell of dualistic mind  separates the world into alienated fragments that seem to be at "odds" with each other.

The only way to realize the union of opposites is through an expansion of consciousness in which we recognize our interconnectedness and interrelatedness, and develop a more complete and holistic vision of our inseparable relationship to each other and the universe as a whole. Not only "subjects" of our inner process, we become the "objects" of a deeper, mythic, archetypal and divine process .

 evil is related to, not separate from, and a revelation of our true nature. evil helps us to realize who we are in a deeper, more ultimate sense. Evil awakens in us the recognition of our true nature, similar to how we would never notice the surface of the mirror without its reflections.  evil can potentially enliven the part of us that is truly free.

 when we become truly acquainted with our true nature – which embraces both light and dark and is simply aware of what it witnesses  Acting from the living experience of our basic goodness and primordial purity, we can then truly be of benefit to the world. 

  [An inflated consciousness] is incapable of learning from the past, incapable of understanding contemporary events, and incapable of drawing right conclusions about the future. It is hypnotized by itself and therefore cannot be argued with. It inevitably dooms itself to calamities that must strike it [and others within its sphere of influence] dead.
            —C. G. Jung

 

pathological part of his psyche has co-opted all of the healthy parts into its service. pathological ...condition,  "…an unknown  ‘something’ has taken possession of a smaller or greater portion of the psyche and asserts its hateful and harmful existence undeterred by insight, reason, and energy... proclaims the power of the unconscious over the conscious mind, the sovereign power of possession."

 We speak of a mother complex, or a father comple,xl a savior complex... embodies  the unconsciousness of the time.  the person playing the archetypal role of savior reflects this unconsciousness and becomes inflated by the power of the archetype. He  compelled to act out his hubris in a way that is destructive for all who are under his dominion... delusions of grandeur, and has become megalomaniacal... unconsciously identified with the archetype of the Messiah. One should listen to the inner voice attentively, intelligently and critically Just because one hears an inner voice doesn’t necessarily mean it should be followed.

 By projecting the shadow in this manner one becomes possessed by the very shadow one projects. This is falling  under the spell of the Devil... possessed byu the  devil... "the deceiver."... 'beast'  Because of inflation, the person feels they are above human morality,  under the delusion that he is the supreme moral arbiter, not realizing that he has fallen into his unconscious, whose dark side he is acting out... pathological condition, he is the last person who should be the judge of morality

 ‘identification with the shadow,’  occurs at moments of collision with the unconscious." by dissociating and projecting out our shadow, we become unconsciously identified with it, possessed by it, and unconsciously act it out. complexes are unconscious this  guarantees them freedom of action.  unconsciousness helps the complex to assimilate the ego, resulting in momentary and unconscious alteration of personality... identification with the complex. In Middle Ages it was called possession.

Because of complete unconsciousness one becomes an instrument for evil...  symbolized by the devil. The devil is a variant of the "shadow" archetype. The person is unconsciously taken over by the shadow become possessed... genuine humility is impossible. the perverse nature... depravity  avoid self-criticism, preach to others,  know nothing of themselves. no self-knowledge so that nothing can disturb their illusions.

By being inflated, one is unconsciously accessing and unleashing the power inherent in the archetype…  an enchanting power over his followers. By identifying with the archetype, the archetype acts as an amplifier, enhancing hypnotic power over his followers. taken over by the unconscious, he has a compelling and entrancing effect on the unconscious of others

. Only one who is seized by an archetype has a gripping effect on others. It is a psychological fact that an archetype can seize hold of the ego and even compel it to act as it wills. A man can then take on archetypal dimensions and exert influence accordingly By being so seized by an archetype of the collective unconscious, becomes an agent that has a very powerful effect on the field around. He becomes a portal through which an underlying psychic epidemic which non-locally pervades the field "malignant egophrenia" feeds, replicates, and actualizes itself

When we become unconsciously gripped by an archetype, we become pawns in the hand of a deeper power. Succumbing to the compulsive adrenaline rush of the "will to power" inherent in the shadow Bush has become arrogant and full of himself, a legend in his own mind, someone who feels he is not bound by law, and believes himself entitled to get away with murder. Speaking about being unconsciously taken over by an archetype Here we see the characteristic effect of the archetype: it seizes hold of the psyche with a kind of primeval force and compels it to transgress the bounds of humanity." When we are gripped by an archetype and forced to unconsciously act out its effects destructively, we are acting out the dark side of this greater power. Etymologically, the word "transgress" is related to the word "evil."

The world literally shape-shifts around someone who is inflated and blown up with an archetype, as this inner state of possession is able to synchronistically express itself through the medium of the outside world. To quote Jung, "…archetypes are not found exclusively in the psychic sphere, but can occur just as much in circumstances that are not psychic (equivalence of an outward physical process with a psychic one)." [Emphasis in original] When we become inflated by an archetype, there is a synchronistic correlation between the inner experience of being identified with the archetype and outer events. The inner state of being possessed by the archetype expresses itself by arranging external events so as to give shape and form to itself. A person inflated by an archetype, such as Bush, literally becomes the channel through which transpersonal, mythic forces become materialized into our third-dimension, which just reinforces his inflation in a diabolical feedback loop.

By identifying with the archetype, Bush becomes seized by the archetype’s irresistible field of force and unwittingly becomes the agent who does the archetype’s bidding. By being so taken over by an impersonal force, Bush has become a "magnet" which torques the field around him so as to insatiably feed his own pathology, while simultaneously wreaking havoc on the field.

Taken over by the archetype’s magnetic power, Bush achieves a certain magnetism, which polarizes the field around it. Like a magnet, archetypes are bi-polar, having a negative and a positive aspect. On the one hand, the power of the archetype coming through Bush attracts people to support him in his delusion who are suggestible to the overwhelming unconscious power inherent in the archetype. In a co-dependent relationship, Bush’s followers feed his identification with the archetype, which simultaneously nourishes their own bewitchment, in a perverse, self-perpetuating feedback loop which develops an autonomous life of its own.

At the same time, Bush’s identification with the archetype repels other people, who react against the one-sidedness and perversity of his inflation. By being so unconsciously identified with the archetype, Bush will literally attract to himself, like a lightning rod attracts lightning, other people’s negative, shadow projections. These people will strongly condemn Bush, and see him as being evil. And yet, people who react against Bush in this way are unwittingly feeding the polarization in the field, perpetuating the very diabolical energy they are reacting against. 

If we concretize Bush as being evil, we are projecting our own shadow onto him and are then guilty of the very evil of which we are accusing Bush. Interestingly, another inner meaning of the word Devil is "the accuser." If we are accusing Bush of being evil, we are guilty of the very evil of which we are accusing Bush. Bush is merely an ignorant human being who, due to his unrestrained greed, desire, and lust for power is unwittingly allowing himself to be used as an instrument of evil. Evil itself is a power, or principality that transcends the merely human dimension, as it is archetypal in nature and thereby is a content belonging to the collective unconscious. Bush is simply a deluded human being who is dangerous because of his position of power, which allows him to act out his pathological process on the world stage. We do not want to make the mistake of attributing evilÑüan archetypal content of the collective unconsciousÑüto Bush as a person.

Becoming possessed by an archetype of the collective unconscious is an expression of not only forfeiting our humanity, but of abdicating our personal responsibility as well. A true Faustian pact with the Devil, we discover too late that what we have lost in the bargain is our soul. As in any such bargain, we are ultimately responsible and accountable for our choices. Identifying with the archetype of the savior is a compensation for a deep inferiority, fear, and weakness. We become absorbed into the archetype due to our inability and unwillingness to deal with the darker part of ourselves that needs saving.

Though describing Hitler, Jung just as easily could have been describing Bush when he said that he had a "…conceit that bordered on madness, a very mediocre intelligence combined with the hysteric’s cunning and the power fantasies of an adolescent." Bush is acting out the adolescent fantasies of a war of good versus evil with our living sons and daughters as his toy soldiers. Being inflated, Bush doesn’t relate to other human beings as being autonomous or independent, but as pawns to serve his own narcissistic blindness and masturbatory fantasies.

Jung pointed out that "Inflation magnifies the blind spot of the eye…. A clear symptom of this is our growing disinclination to take note of the reactions of the environment and pay heed to them." When we are inflated, we don’t accept any reflection or feedback from the outer universe that contradicts our puffed up image of ourselves. Instead of being open, receptive, and learning from the outer world, we continually interpret everything to support our delusory self-image. When we become inflated, we become closed to any information or in-forming influence from the outside world, which is a form of psychic blindness. Instead of being in genuine relationship to the world, a person who is inflated relates to the world through their own narcissistically self-serving, grandiose self-image.

Speaking about madness, Jung said that it "…consists essentially in the fact that the unconscious in large measure ousts and supplants the function of the conscious mind. The unconscious usurps the reality function and substitutes its own reality." Jung continued that this resulted in "…senseless, unshakable judgments upheld in the face of reality [for example, Bush saying, ‘the war in Iraq is going well,’ despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary]." Being caught up in inflation is like being sucked up by a cyclone, as there is literally no getting through to the person who is inflated, who has been taken over and lifted off the ground by a more powerful energy. Bush and his supporters feed into and off of and support each others’ unconscious madness so as to conjure up an impenetrable field around them that resists consciousness at all costs. It is only when their world destructs that the universe forces them out of their psychosis.

Just as the unconscious always compensates a one-sidedness, inflation inevitably results in all of the air (life, breath, spirit) being taken out of the person who is inflated. Inflation is ultimately self-destructive and always results in catastrophe. Talking about inflation, Jung said that it "…can be damped down only by the most terrible catastrophe to civilization, another deluge let loose by the gods upon inhospitable humanity." The fact that our government, led by an inflated madman, is insanely and endlessly investing in and feeding the industry of creating weapons of mass destruction is an extremely dangerous situation for all of us. To quote Jung, "Let man but accumulate sufficient engines of destruction and the devil within him will soon be unable to resist putting them to their fated use. It is well known that fire-arms go off of themselves if only enough of them are together."

Bush has let the spirit out of the bottle which will undoubtedly destroy him. Being possessed by the unconscious is a very dangerous situation, particularly when the person so taken over is in a position of power where he can act out as well as activate a virulent madness on the world stage. Bush’s madness affects all those under his sphere of influence, which in this case is the entire planet. Jung commented, "It is abundantly clear that such an abaissement du niveau mental [lowering of the mental level], i.e., the overpowering of the ego by unconscious contents and the consequent identification with a preconscious [as compared to conscious] wholeness, possesses a prodigious psychic virulence, or power of contagion, and is capable of the most disastrous results." When such a "lowering of the mental level" happens collectively, a psychic epidemic becomes activated in the field. The (collective) unconscious goes from being in the background and comes actively to the foreground, where it makes itself known by (destructively) giving shape and form to world events. It is merely a question of mitigating the damage of this virulent psychic epidemic for the rest of us.

Seen as a dreaming process, we are all complicit in dreaming up Bush to pick up the archetypal role of savior. Our doing this is clearly a reflection of the part of ourselves which is disempowered and is not in touch with the savior within ourselves. To be in touch with the savior within ourselves is to be in touch with the wholeness of our true nature, which is to be truly saved and redeemed. To the extent that any of us get in touch with the part of ourselves that is a genuine redeemer and leader, we literally are dis-investing energy from the archetypal role of leader being dreamed up outside of ourselves in a pathological way. When we consciously and collectively access the part of ourselves that is a leader by our very nature, we become truly empowered. Being in touch with our God-given power engenders a situation in which the savior archetype is consciously distributed throughout the field, rather than being localized and concentrated in a single figure, which is a set-up for abuse.

The only way to change the collective nightmare we are sharing is through inner transformation in the individual, which collectively gets mobilized on the world stage so that we can effect genuine change. As each of us wakes up, we discover that we can reciprocally empower each other so that we can consciously activate the archetypal figure of the savior in the collective unconscious itself. Mediating, humanizing and incarnating this archetypal figure consciously throughout the field, we connect in lucidity, stepping into being agents of light who collectively dis-spell the darkness in the field.